Industry Solutions
Cryptographic consent enforcement built for regulated industries. Every regulation mapped. Every enforcement mechanism proven.
Voice AI Platforms
ELVIS Act, NO FAKES Act, SAG-AFTRAVoice cloning platforms have no cryptographic consent verification. Checkbox consent is legally insufficient.
Consent gate enforces verification before any voice clone or face synthesis. Token-validated, receipt-backed.
Every clone attempt generates a dual-signed receipt proving consent was verified.
Enterprise Security / CISO
SOC 2, ISO 27001, NIST AI RMFAI operations generate unverifiable logs. No tamper-proof evidence trail for auditors.
Receipt Rail generates dual-signed, integrity-verified receipts for every AI operation. Fail-closed enforcement.
384-file audit pack with negative proofs. 117/117 red team attacks blocked.
Healthcare
HIPAA, HITECHDiagnostic AI makes decisions affecting patient care with no cryptographic consent proof.
Patient consent enforcement via cryptographic tokens. FHIR-compatible receipts. Sub-8ms verification.
Hospital IDV product with deterministic consent gates.
Financial Services
DORA, SOX, PCI-DSSAI-driven credit decisions, fraud detection, and trading systems lack tamper-proof evidence trails.
Instant revocation across all enforcement points. Governance coverage metrics for compliance reporting.
Production kernel benchmarks demonstrate high-frequency enforcement throughput.
Government & Defense
FedRAMP, NIST 800-53Classified AI workloads need hardware-attested enforcement with post-quantum signatures.
Boot-level AI governance. Hardware attestation (TPM/SGX/SEV). Post-quantum signatures.
OS-level kernel gating. GPU memory gating.
Entertainment & Media
SAG-AFTRA, EU AI Act Art 14/16Digital replicas generated without performer consent. No enforcement mechanism.
Content Twin with C2PA provenance. Cryptographic consent gate before any synthetic media.
67/67 content twin tests passing. PQC dual-signing on all generated content.
Compliance Matrix
Enforcement mapped to major regulatory frameworks. Every claim backed by cryptographic evidence, not policy documents.
| Regulation | Articles | Enforcement Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| GDPR | Art 7, 17 | Cryptographic consent proof, verified erasure |
| CCPA | §1798.100–199 | Receipt-backed consent, instant revocation |
| EU AI Act | Art 14, 16 | Fail-closed gates, dual-signed audit trail |
| HIPAA | Privacy Rule | Patient consent tokens, FHIR receipts |
| PCI-DSS | Req 3, 7, 10 | Cardholder data segmentation, receipt rail |
| SOC 2 | CC6, CC7 | 384-file audit pack, negative proofs |
| FedRAMP | AC, AU, SC | Hardware attestation, boot-level enforcement |
| NIST AI RMF | MAP, MEASURE, MANAGE | Governance coverage metrics, enforcement reporting |
Need consent enforcement for your industry?
We map enforcement to your regulatory stack. GDPR, HIPAA, EU AI Act, FedRAMP — built in, not bolted on.